Toolbox
Scenario Building
Toolbox Themes
- Climate Action
- Urban Nature
- Sustainable Urban Mobility
Objectives
Visualise and project how the situation of the municipality may change in the future under certain scenarios.
Results
Definition of the baseline, optimal and strategic scenarios
Projection of variables describing the city according to the identified scenarios, including population, density, urban expansion (if required), equipment and required public space.
Description
This activity contains qualitative and quantitative tools that allow the description and calculation of future scenario (that might include desirable and undesirable situations) analyse their impacts on the territory and thus clarify and anticipate possible futures. Scenarios should be defined on the basis of a time horizon. They can also be calculated on the basis of short-, medium - and long - term projections.
Scenarios can include the baseline or "as usual", the optimal, and the strategic. The first assumes that existing trajectories will not change in the future and conditions will be extrapolated from what is currently and has been happening in the past. It is important that this scenario is considered because it allows to visualise and identify what would happen if no action were taken in the urban development of the city, map any undesirable conditions, and plan to avoid them. The optimal scenario is the one where all strategic variables are considered to reach the best possible status, but which will not necessarily be feasible or achievable. The strategic scenario is the desirable scenario and considers what is realistic under current conditions. This scenario should be aligned with the vision and objectives that will be set out in the next activity.
To build the scenarios, some assumptions need to be first established, defining what are the minimum conditions needed for each "as usual", optimal and strategic scenario to develop. To do this, review the narratives of each of the scenarios developed previously (T25 Scenario Building Narratives). Then, there needs to be a selection of variables that will be studied under each scenario. These can vary and depend on the scope of the planning process but need to be linked to sustainable development. Such variables include but are not limited to population projections, urban expansion or densification demand, requirements for public space and urban services, etc. After the variables are selected, they need to be calculated for each of the scenarios.
To calculate population growth and urban footprint, the team can use T24 Demographic and Density Projection. This uses population census data to first estimate projections in a defined timeframe. Then, different scenarios can be studied. First, if no expansion is required, a projection of the new population density can be calculated, considering the population growth. Second, if a planned urban expansion area is needed, scenarios of the required urban land area can be projected, considering the current and other benchmarks of population density. Density averages by type of single-family or multi-family housing should be considered, as well as ensuring that the growth rate of the urban footprint (area that the city expands) is aligned to the projected population growth. It should be noted that suitability analysis (in T18 Analysis and Cartography Checklist) should accompany the planned urban expansion projections. As urban expansion often requires new infrastructure and social facility investments, densification and infill development options should be assessed prior to any expansion decisions.
Additionally, the T43 Facilities and Public Space Projections can be used to estimate the deficit and current coverage of each type of facility (healthcare, education, commercial, sports, cultural, etc.), as well as to determine the number of units of each type needed to cover, as the case may be, the current unmet demand and the future demand based on projections. The analysis should be carried out with special attention to the demand for facilities according to the scale of the city and its population. The tool also allows to calculate and compare the necessary public space surface and the current and future coverage, according to national ratios and international recommendations. It is important to clarify that this calculation is done on an aggregated basis for the whole city, and it is necessary to analyse the distribution of existing and future public facilities and spaces. In order to do so, the scenario building can be complemented with spatial analysis to evaluate which areas of the city lack accessibility to these facilities, defining buffers that correspond to walking distances (e.g. accessibility in 5, 10, 15 minutes), according to the scale of the city and the capacity of facilities. These analyses could be taken from Block D Analysis and Diagnosis.
Finally, it is recommended to estimate the provision of public services such as water demand, electricity consumption, sanitation services, solid waste management, road network infrastructure, etc. in order to know the demand for each type of service, and to establish a basis for the strategies to propose the amount of primary infrastructure or public investments required.
Steps
1. Define the timeframe for the scenarios.
2. Identify the assumptions for each of the scenarios: baseline / "as usual", optimistic, strategic. This can be done by reviewing the different narratives and then identifying key assumptions (T25 Scenario Building Narratives).
3. Define the variables that need to be considered and calculated for each of the scenarios.
4. Calculate the population and density projections (T19 Demographic and Density Projections).
5. Calculate the rest of the variables, including the requirement for urban facilities and public spaces (T43 Facilities and Public Space Projections) as well as accessibility and provision of public services.
Resources
- Vision, Scenario Building and Action Plan Report Al Hashmi Al Janoubi Neighbourhood
- Vision, Scenario Building and Action Plan Report Al Afrah Neighbourhood
- Vision, Scenario Building, and Action Plan for the city of New Damietta
- Scenario projections for Master Plan Puente Nichupté, Cancun - Mexico (pg. 287)
- Tecnical note on estimates of infrastructure investment needs
Sustainable Urban Mobility

In this scenario development phase, cities should follow these key steps to explore and assess potential pathways for future urban mobility. Use T35 Transport Scenario Model as a guide:
- Develop a Business-as-Usual (BaU) Scenario:
- Project the outcomes if current policies and trends continue unchanged.
- Use the BaU scenario to highlight potential negative impacts, such as increased congestion, higher air pollution, rising road fatalities, and declining public transport use.
- Establish this scenario as a baseline to illustrate the need for more sustainable policies.
- Define Alternate Scenarios Based on Goals and Targets:
- Define scenario alternatives that represent different future pathways. Tool T25 Scenario Building Narratives can be used to develop scenario narratives focused on mobility.
- Consider policy interventions like expanding public transport networks, enhancing walking and cycling infrastructure, or introducing low-emission zones.
- Ensure each scenario reflects diverse policy, infrastructure, and behavioural changes aligned with sustainability objectives.
Following these steps will allow decision-makers to clearly identify the most promising strategies for advancing the city’s vision in a balanced and informed manner.
Tool:
T35 Transport Scenario Model
Additional Resource:
Integration is key: the role of electric mobility for low-carbon and sustainable cities.
Urban Nature, Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Action

During the scenario-building process, cities should evaluate projected changes in climate, biodiversity and urban expansion. For example:
- Baseline Scenario (Business-as-Usual): Use biodiversity and climate data to highlight risks like reduced green space, biodiversity loss, or increased vulnerability to heat waves and flooding if no action is taken.
- Optimal Scenario: This may involve large-scale rewilding, costly stormwater infrastructure, or rapid ecosystem transformation, which could prove unfeasible or result in impractical implementation and unintended consequences. In such scenarios, there is often an assumption of overly ambitious objectives without adequately considering technical, financial, or governance constraints.
- Strategic Scenario: Ground projections in realistic actions aligned with the city’s vision, focusing on feasible measures like introducing native plants in public spaces, establishing green corridors, or designing climate-resilient neighbourhoods through green roofs, permeable pavements or urban gardening.
Variables such as species habitat coverage, carbon sequestration potential, or access to green infrastructure can be quantified to compare scenarios. Spatial analysis tools can help identify areas of the city most in need of biodiversity restoration or climate adaptation measures, linking these trends to practical urban design and infrastructure planning. This approach ensures that scenarios incorporate the dual goals of climate resilience and biodiversity preservation.
Additional Resources:
Hotstop Stoplight (presentation)
Cities and Nature: Planning for the Future
IBPS Assessment Report on scenarios and models of biodiversity